Parasoft Logo

AI in Software Testing: How It’s Changing Embedded and Enterprise Testing

By Joanna Schloss September 3, 2025 8 min read

AI transforms software testing by enabling enterprise teams to scale security compliance and embedded developers to validate safety on resource-constrained hardware. Read on to learn how AI can serve as a powerful amplifier with human oversight. Be aware of the risks without proper guardrails.

AI in Software Testing: How It’s Changing Embedded and Enterprise Testing

Headshot of Joanna Schloss
By Joanna Schloss September 3, 2025 8 min read

AI transforms software testing by enabling enterprise teams to scale security compliance and embedded developers to validate safety on resource-constrained hardware. Read on to learn how AI can serve as a powerful amplifier with human oversight. Be aware of the risks without proper guardrails.

AI in software testing is accelerating how teams design, run, and maintain tests across two distinct worlds: embedded and enterprise.

  • In an enterprise environment, AI software testing helps you scale while meeting privacy and security obligations.
  • In embedded systems, it must prove deterministic safety on constrained hardware and align with standards such as ISO 26262 and MISRA.

Used effectively, AI augments people and shifts work to the left. Used poorly, it can inflate coverage without validating behavior.

How Is AI Used in Software Testing?

AI in software testing augments people. It speeds up authoring, selection, and remediation, but it does not improve code quality on its own. Treat AI output as a draft. Maintain standards and reviews to ensure you move faster without introducing new risks.

Parasoft blends three kinds of AI across the tool suite—proprietary algorithms, generative AI, and agentic AI—and brings assistance to where you work: inside the IDE, during static analysis, and in reporting and analytics.

Where AI Helps Most

Start early, as close to the code as possible. Use static analysis to surface violations at commit time, generate unit and API tests while changes are fresh, and link tests to code so you only run what matters. That early signal shrinks rework and keeps regressions out of integration.

  • Planning and risk. Analyze change history, coverage, and criticality to focus on the highest‑risk areas first.
  • Test design and generation. Draft unit, API, and scenario tests from contracts, code, and examples. Then review and refine.
  • Data and environments. Create realistic datasets and virtualize unstable or costly dependencies so regressions are repeatable.
  • Execution and selection. Choose the smallest, most relevant subset for each build through change‑based selection.
  • Analysis and triage. Cluster failures, detect anomalies, and recommend fixes.
  • Maintenance. Update brittle assertions as interfaces evolve.
  • Documentation and compliance. Map evidence to rules and produce audit‑ready reports.

Standards Adoption: 3 Layers to Consider

AI’s role changes with the depth of compliance you must meet:

  • Security (broad and thin). Enterprise teams prioritize privacy and security, adhering to standards such as HIPAA, GDPR, OWASP, and CWE. AI helps run rules, flag violations, suggest fixes, and assemble evidence, enabling you to demonstrate conformance.
  • Functional safety/safety security. For embedded code, rulesets such as MISRA and AUTOSAR C++14 matter. AI can check how code is built against these rules and propose compliant changes. The tools you use must support these standards and, where required, provide qualification evidence for safety‑critical workflows.
  • True compliance. Safety‑critical products require certification‑grade evidence across testing, documentation, and validation. AI can help gather artifacts and keep documentation current, while human review ensures that changes are safe and effective.

Language and Runtime Notes

For Java and .NET, Parasoft offers options to work with OpenAI or customer‑managed LLMs inside Jtest and dotTEST.

In C/C++, teams often pair C/C++test with code assistants such as Copilot while relying on Parasoft for deep static analysis and standards support.

Explore Parasoft’s range of compliance solutions tailored to the specific rule sets your program requires.

Embedded vs. Enterprise at a Glance

Enterprise

Your center of gravity is data governance and environment performance. You run at scale, integrate with business systems, and meet privacy and security obligations such as HIPAA and GDPR. Security standards, such as OWASP and CWE, provide guidance on best practices.

AI accelerates rule enforcement, prioritizes remediation, and can generate code fixes you review and apply within a sprint. Reporting and analytics help you identify what to fix first and how one change can resolve multiple violations.

Embedded

Your center of gravity is deterministic, safe software for constrained environments. Every line of code must be correct before release.

Standards such as CERT, MISRA, and AUTOSAR drive how you write, analyze, test, and document code.

AI/ML assists by checking code against safety rules and recommending compliant fixes.. Utilize AI to expedite development and code analysis, keeping your team members in the loop for compliance progress.

Across Both Worlds

Parasoft applies a blended AI approach—utilizing proprietary algorithms, generative AI, and agentic AI—plus non-AI fundamentals, such as service virtualization and mature static analysis.

For Java and .NET, Jtest and dotTEST integrate with OpenAI or customer LLMs. For C/C++, C/C++test focuses on standards‑driven analysis, while teams may use Copilot for code suggestions.

The goal remains the same: to identify priorities, address issues promptly, and demonstrate compliance through transparent and auditable reports.

What Are the Key Benefits & Potential Pitfalls of AI in Testing?

AI is a human amplifier, not a human replacer. Used well, it speeds authoring, selection, and remediation. Our approach applies AI precisely and keeps people informed, ensuring tests remain meaningful.

Measurable Benefits You Can Expect

  • Faster creation of practical tests. Generate unit and API tests with auto‑assertions, parameterized data, and realistic inputs. Track assertion density, coverage growth on critical modules, and time to author a test. The goal is verified behavior, not just runnable code.
  • Shorter regression cycles. Link tests to code changes to run only what’s impacted in each build. Measure suite runtime, percentage of impacted tests executed, and lead time from commit to result.
  • Quicker remediation of security and compliance findings. Use AI to propose code fixes from static analysis results, then review and apply them. Watch violations resolved per sprint, time to green after a scan, and first‑pass fix rate.
  • Stable, repeatable environments. Build virtual services when dependencies are unavailable or costly. Track blocked runs, environment uptime, and time to provision a testable setup.
  • Faster triage with clearer signals. Cluster failures, surface anomalies, and group by suspected root cause. Measure the mean time to triage and the duplicate defect rate.
  • Higher confidence in standards alignment. Map static analysis results to OWASP, CWE, MISRA, AUTOSAR C++14, and your internal policies. Monitor rule pass rates and audit‑readiness of reports.

7 Warning Signs of Dangerous AI Over‑Reliance

  1. Coverage rises, escapes rise too. You see more lines covered, yet more defects reach production.
  2. "Empty" tests. Many tests execute code paths but include weak or missing assertions. They run, but they don’t validate behavior.
  3. No human review. AI‑generated code and tests merge without approval or traceability.
  4. Vanity metrics lead the conversation. Teams celebrate the number of tests, suites, or lines instead of stability, fix rates, and user impact.
  5. Data governance gaps. Prompts or training data include secrets or regulated information without controls.
  6. Policy misfit. GenAI is enabled in regulated settings without requiring risk approval or tool qualification, where applicable.
  7. Inconsistent results. Outputs drift across runs with the same inputs, and no one investigates why.

How Parasoft Avoids the Traps

  • Tests that validate functionality. Our AI doesn’t generate "empty" tests. It creates data‑rich tests with assertions and parameterization designed to verify behavior.
  • Human in the loop, by design. People review AI output before it lands in your codebase. You keep control over quality, security, and compliance.
  • Precision over hype. We blend proprietary algorithms, generative AI, and agentic AI, where each adds real value. This is achieved within the IDE through static analysis, as well as in reporting and analytics, allowing you to work more productively.

Use AI to do more with less, then prove it with the proper measurements: lead time, runtime, flake rate, escape rate, time to triage, violations fixed per sprint, and audit‑ready evidence.

If those trends go the wrong way while raw counts trend up, you’re over relying on the tool and underinvesting in quality.

Use Cases: How AI & Humans Work Together

What AI can’t do? AI in software testing doesn’t set quality goals, define requirements, or decide what "good" looks like for your business. It can’t sign off on safety‑critical changes, guarantee compliance on its own, or replace human judgment in ambiguous flows, visual checks, and accessibility reviews.

Treat AI as an amplifier, not a replacer. Keep people in the loop to review what’s generated and confirm that tests validate behavior, not just execute code.

Where AI Helps Right Now

1. Build or expand a regression suite fast.

When coverage is thin, especially on legacy code, use AI‑assisted generation to create effective unit and API tests. In practice, developers accelerate unit tests in Jtest and dotTEST, and teams extend API coverage with SOAtest’s generators and agentic capabilities.

Parasoft’s approach does more than produce runnable stubs. It adds assertions, parameterized data, and realistic inputs so that tests check functionality, not just the lines executed.

2. Stabilize environments with service virtualization.

Third-party services, in-flight components, or paid dependencies can prevent regressions. Virtualize those systems to keep pipelines moving.

You can start with simple request-response pairs managed in a spreadsheet and scale up from there. GenAI enables the faster creation of virtual assets from service definitions and sample traffic, facilitating the adoption and growth of virtualization among QA teams without requiring deep scripting.

3. Focus runs with change‑based selection.

Large suites can take hours or days. Link tests to code changes so each build runs only what’s impacted. This preserves coverage where it matters and shortens feedback from one sprint to the next. AI enhances mapping and prioritization, ensuring critical paths are addressed first.

4. Remediate security and compliance findings faster.

Run static analysis against OWASP, CWE, MISRA, AUTOSAR, and your internal policies. Use AI to propose code fixes, then review and apply them within a sprint. Reporting and analytics help you identify what to fix first and how one change can resolve multiple related issues.

5. Author faster in the IDE.

Use GenAI assistants in editors like VS Code to draft tests, generate assertions in natural language, capture values from one step, and reuse them in the next. Because assistants are grounded in Parasoft documentation, new users can ramp up quickly, while experts can move faster.

Guardrails that Keep AI Useful

  • Keep human review on every AI‑generated change. No merges without approval and traceability.
  • Measure outcomes that matter: lead time, suite runtime, flake rate, escape rate, mean time to triage, and violations fixed per sprint. If those trends go the wrong way while raw counts climb, you’re over‑relying on the tool.
  • Align with data governance and policy. In regulated settings, keep GenAI off until risk and compliance teams are ready, then turn it on to accelerate work you already trust.

The result is a clear split of responsibilities. AI handles the repetitive, high-volume aspects of regression: generation, selection, triage, and remediation. Humans oversee intent, safety, compliance, and the final decision on quality.

Automate AI Testing With Parasoft

Parasoft brings AI to software testing for real teams and real pipelines with a precise, human-in-the-loop approach.

You get the speed of generative and agentic AI, where it helps most, backed by Parasoft’s proprietary analysis and governance in reporting and analytics.

  • Code‑level quality. Accelerate unit testing and raise code hygiene early. Jtest can auto‑create and execute JUnit tests, optimize runs based on code changes, and, with optional LLMs, make generated tests more robust. dotTEST delivers live static analysis in the IDE so issues surface while you code. Parasoft’s integrations with OpenAI or customer-managed LLMs support test improvements and recommended fixes for violations, with review before merging.
  • API and end‑to‑end quality. SOAtest accelerates API test creation, suggests assertions, and utilizes intelligent AI to generate data-rich scenarios. The AI Assertor supports complex, natural-language validations, allowing teams to verify behavior, not just lines executed.
  • Stable environments. Virtualize removes blockers by simulating slow, costly, or unavailable dependencies. Start simple with request‑response pairs and grow into data‑driven assets using CSV or Excel, then layer AI to generate virtual services from definitions and traffic when you are ready.
  • Focused execution with test impact analysis. Run only what changed and keep feedback tight. DTP’s Test Impact Analysis maps tests to code deltas, allowing daily builds to execute the smallest relevant set, while full baselines run on schedule.
  • Analytics and reporting. DTP consolidates results, highlights anomalies, and helps you produce audit‑ready evidence. Security and compliance artifacts (for example, CWE) and safety reporting workflows provide teams with clarity on what to fix first and how a single change can address multiple violations.
  • Embedded readiness. For C/C++, C/C++test provides static analysis, unit testing, coverage, and safety workflows aligned to standards such as ISO 26262, with TÜV SÜD certifications available for tool qualification.

WoodmenLife cut regression time by 212%, realized $845,000 ROI across 13 releases, and achieved 360× faster testing using service virtualization, combining intelligent selection with robust API automation and disciplined CI.

Ready to put AI in software testing to work across your portfolio?

See how Parasoft automates complex tasks, enhances stability, and accelerates delivery.

Request a Demo